Mesothelioma Lawyers
 
Seglaw.com | Sitemap | Bookmark
Call for Free Consultation
1-866-632-7574
 
info@seglaw.com
 
   
 
You Are Here: Mesothelioma Legal Blog > 2009 > August
 
   

Archive for August, 2009

Asbestos Ad Irony

Thursday, August 13th, 2009

As we were combing the vast Internet for news items relating to asbestos exposure and mesothelioma, we came across this asbestos ad from around 1981.

The ad reads:

“The bigger the building, the more important fire-proofing becomes. That’s why today’s buildings have asbestos-cement walls and even floors containing asbestos. Asbestos contains fire, cannot burn, and holds up after metal and glass have melted down, giving vital time for people to escape. You’ll also find asbestos sealing plumbing joints, insulating heating pipes, electric motors and generators. Asbestos. We couldn’t live the way we do without it.”

The ad follows typical deception tactics used by asbestos manufacturers throughout the 20th century: talk about the benefits of the substance and cover up the effects of asbestos exposure such as asbestosis, mesothelioma, and other deadly lung cancers.

As mesothelioma attorneys, we’ve seen first hand how insidious and deceptive asbestos is. Those that fireproofed buildings and ships such as those mentioned in the ad are the ones blindsided by disease and suffering. Mesothelioma lies silent for decades; and then, once victims are showing symptoms, they are often in its advanced stages.

To add even further to the irony, we noted how the ad photo shows the World Trade Center’s twin towers. How many people near the buildings on 9/11 or working as part of the rescue and clean up in the weeks and months afterwards were unknowingly exposed to asbestos and will develop mesothelioma or other asbestos related disease down the road?

If you think you or a loved one have mesothelioma call our mesothelioma attorneys toll free at 866-632-7574 to learn about your rights

Do Damage Caps Make Sense?

Wednesday, August 12th, 2009

Damage caps are one type of tort reform that can significantly affect your mesothelioma lawsuit. They vary widely by state; some states have no damage caps in place but others, such as Texas, have damage caps for both economic and non-economic damages.

Essentially, what damage caps do is to say, “No matter the details of your case or the gross and willful neglect of the defendant, the cap overrides the ability of a jury to assign a fair and appropriate award.”

As mesothelioma lawyers, we strongly believe that a jury is best suited to determine a fair award. How can lawmakers make across the board decisions about cases they’ve never heard?

We’ve seen damage caps that do nothing more than give defendants a slap on the wrist and leave victims with overwhelming physical, emotional, and financial loss.

Unfortunately, a lot of Americans think they support tort reform until they become victims. Then, they regret their support. More Americans need to hear their stories.

So we’re opening up this blog post to your stories. How have damage caps affected your case? How did they leave you with the burden of the defendant’s irresponsibility? What was covered and what wasn’t that should have been?

Make sure your story is heard!

Corporate Checks and Balances

Monday, August 10th, 2009

Given the news headlines over the last couple of years, most Americans can agree that corporate greed seems to be worse than ever; and many of us guess that what we’re seeing is just the tip of the iceberg.

As mesothelioma lawyers, we’re more acquainted with corporate wrongdoing than the average citizen. We fight for our clients as they go up against multimillion or even multibillion dollar corporations that have spent a lot of money to cover their tracks.

We’ve also noted that many of the corporations get away with the fraud, environmental pollution, and toxic products they make big bucks on because they’ve been able to get past regulatory organizations that are there to protect us – by many different means, legal and illegal.

Cost Benefit Analyses

One of the most callous tactics done by companies such as some of those that produced asbestos products in the 20th century is the cost benefit analysis. Basically, companies add up the money they think they’ll be able to earn from selling dangerous products over a set period of time, and then compare that against:

How many people will be hurt by their products → the percent of those hurt that will file a lawsuit against them → how much they’ll have to pay in settlement and jury awards.

If, after their analysis, they estimate that they’d still make a significant profit, they proceeded with selling the deadly asbestos product. This tactic is not limited to asbestos companies and is widespread.

Using tort reform, like-minded companies have recently attempted to get very small damage caps, seriously limited statutes of limitations, and nearly impossible causation standards passed to further decrease their lawsuit costs and expect higher profits. If they can expect higher than ever profits because of tort reform, they will show even less hesitation with putting dangerous products on the market.

What Keeps Corporate Wrongdoing in Check?

If regulatory boards and organizations can be bribed and are subject to corruption, and big corporations have and will again sell toxic and dangerous products based on a heartless cost benefit analysis, it is easy to understand why Americans despair.

But there is something that can keep corporate wrongdoing in check. It’s what has always been the most significant deterrent for corporations, and it’s what tort reform is trying to bring to an end: lawsuits that hit the makers of products such as asbestos, benzene, hexavalent chromium, silicone breast implants and the Dalkon Shield where it hurts most: their profits.

Historically, lawsuits and whistleblowers have forced corporations to change their ways: think Erin Brockovich, Karen Silkwood, Sharon Watkins, etc. These companies do not want their dirty deeds brought to the public’s attention and they don’t want to have to pay a large share of their profits for lawsuits.

That’s why we mesothelioma attorneys have joined with other lawyers, consumer advocate groups, grassroots organizations and U.S. citizens to fight tort reform. Corporate greed doesn’t need any encouragement, and that’s exactly what tort reform does—make it easier for them to make big money while hurting more people.

Fight with us to keep the checks and balances in place!

Thoughts on the McDonalds Hot Coffee Case

Friday, August 7th, 2009

You may have received an email about a “frivolous” lawsuit over a woman spilling McDonalds coffee in her lap—and winning millions of dollars. It is suspected that emails like these are widely circulated by the “spin doctors” in charge of pushing propaganda to get people to support tort reform.

Those emails were slanted to support their agenda and did not truthfully report what happened to Ms. Liebeck, the elderly injured woman. Here’s what they might not have told you:

  • She received third degree burns to her inner thighs, genitals, and buttocks.
  • She was in the hospital for eight days. She had to have skin grafts and burned tissue surgically removed.
  • The coffee was 185 degrees. Testimony by McDonald’s quality assurance manager indicated that they knew a burn hazard was present above 140 degrees, yet they chose to keep it 45 degrees hotter.
  • McDonalds own records indicate more than 700 people claimed they were burned by their coffee between 1982 and 1993, some third degree burns, and still the company refused to lower the temperature.
  • Ms. Liebeck originally tried to settle her claim with McDonalds for $20,000, but they refused.
  • A jury assigned her 20% responsibility for the injury because she spilled the coffee.
  • The judge said that McDonalds conduct was reckless, willful, and callous.

And what about those millions of dollars she received? Fiction. She was awarded $160,000 in compensatory damages. For punitive damages she was first awarded $2.7 million, the equivalent of two days of McDonalds coffee sales, but it was reduced to $480,000. After the verdict, Ms. Liebeck and McDonalds reached a settlement.

Do big corporations need to be held financially responsible for their reckless, willful, and callous actions when those actions harm someone? Are financial awards one of the few and most effective ways to hold those corporations responsible? As mesothelioma attorneys fighting for the rights of our clients, we strongly say “YES!”

If you or a loved one has developed mesothelioma from the negligence of an asbestos company, you have a right to seek compensation, just as Ms. Liebeck did. Contact our experienced mesothelioma lawyers today for a free consultation.

Man Outlives Mesothelioma Prognosis by Seven Years

Thursday, August 6th, 2009

In October, 2001, James Rhio O’Connor was diagnosed with mesothelioma and given less than a year to live. He had a cancerous tumor in his lung, but the tumor’s location made it inoperable. He recently passed away but outlived his prognosis by seven years.

Chemotherapy and radiation were both mesothelioma treatment options available to O’Connor, but he chose not to receive them. Instead, he opted for alternatives to mainstream treatments such as intensive rounds of vitamins and other food supplements, a restrictive diet, and “mind-body” medicine.

O’Connor’s story is remarkable in that mesothelioma victims typically only live for an average of 2 years after diagnosis. There are, however, reported instances of people living longer.

Mesothelioma is incurable. There is no legitimate medical research that supports the validity of alternative therapies, such as the ones O’Connor used, to cure the disease. Mesothelioma treatments are only palliative in nature; that is, they serve to make the patient more comfortable for the remainder of their life. Some patients have found alternative treatments, such as meditation, of value in addition to more traditional treatments such as chemotherapy or radiation.

In addition to fighting for mesothelioma victims’ rights in the courtroom, our mesothelioma attorneys and support staff keep a comprehensive library of resources on mesothelioma treatments, doctors, financial resources and much more.

If you have any questions about mesothelioma, call us today at 1-866-632-7574.